Ivy v. Wingo et al
| John Ivy |
| C/O P. Wingo, K. Cottrell, M. Pollard and S. Anderson |
| 3:2020cv01345 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Accepting re #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, from Plaintiff John Ivy. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.);received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/16/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Ivy. (dsn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, IFP Filed, filed by John Ivy. (Attachments: #1 CDCR Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1345-CAB-AHG. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
