Soto v. Los Angeles County et al
| Jose Luis Campos Soto |
| John Doe #2, Los Angeles County, City of Norwalk and John Doe #1 |
| 3:2020cv01406 |
| July 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Linda Lopez |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Transfer Letter Received from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case number in other court is 2:20-cv-07027 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.*350 West 1st Street STE 4311, 4th Floor**Los Angeles, CA 90012-4565*. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 7/31/20. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/3/2020) (jmo)(dlg). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Los Angeles County, City of Norwalk, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, filed by Jose Luis Campos Soto. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1406-DMS-LL. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
