Jennings v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
| Darcella Jennings |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does 1 through 20 |
| 3:2020cv01421 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 pi |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from District of New Jersey. Case number in other court is 1:20-cv-10243 (mme) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Files transferred electronically to: *U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey*.*United States Courthouse, 400 Cooper St., Room 1050**Camden, NJ 08102-1570* (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (jdt) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. Identifying Other Affiliate CVS Health Corporation for CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (vxc) (dsn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2020-00023601-CU-PO-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14210561.), filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1421-BAS-AGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(vxc) (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
