Tollen v. Comerica Incorporated et al
Gabriel Tollen |
Comerica Management Company, Inc., Comerica Bank, Does 1 through 50 and Comerica Incorporated |
3:2020cv01529 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Michael M Anello |
Karen S Crawford |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Joint Motion and Staying Action Pending Arbitration. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is stayed pending resolution of the parties' arbitration proceedings. The Court VACATES any pending deadlines or hearings and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to administratively close the case. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report within five (5) court days following the termination of arbitration proceedings, or in the alternative, if appropriate, a joint motion for dismissal. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/2/2020. (tcf) (jms). |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay Action Pending Arbitration by Comerica Bank, Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Management Company, Inc. (Kennedy, Tracey) (tcf). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Taejoon Kim on behalf of Comerica Bank, Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Management Company, Inc. (Kim, Timothy)Attorney Timothy Taejoon Kim added to party Comerica Bank(pty:dft), Attorney Timothy Taejoon Kim added to party Comerica Incorporated(pty:dft), Attorney Timothy Taejoon Kim added to party Comerica Management Company, Inc.(pty:dft) (tcf). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Anthony Huch on behalf of Gabriel Tollen (Huch, David)Attorney David Anthony Huch added to party Gabriel Tollen(pty:pla) QC mailer sent re: update address in Pacer (tcf). |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference. A telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation is set for 9/23/2020 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. In the event the case does not settle during the ENE Conference, a Case Management Conference will be held immediately following the conclusion of the ENE Conference. The Joint Discovery Plan shall be filed on the CM/ECF system and lodged by email on or before 9/16/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 8/10/2020. (tcf) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Comerica Bank, Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Management Company, Inc. No Parties With Financial Interest. (zda)(jrd) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Comerica Bank, Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Management Company, Inc. (zda)(jrd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand From State of CA, San Diego County, Superior Court, case number 37-2020-00016620-CU-OE-CTL. (Filing fee $400.00 receipt number ACASDC-14287812.), filed by Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Management Company, Inc., Comerica Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Contents re Exhibits for Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit A - Summons, #4 Exhibit B - Complaint, #5 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit D - Notice of Case Assignment, #7 Declaration of Catherine Garrett in Support of Notice of Removal, #8 Proof of Service re Notice of Removal and Initiating Case Documents)(Additional attachment(s) added on 8/7/2020: #9 Exhibit E - Answer to Complaint)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1529-MMA-KSC. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(zda)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.