Lucas v. County of San Diego et al
| Miguel Lucas |
| DOES 1-10, Deputy Gustafson and County of San Diego |
| 3:2020cv01735 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Responsive Pleading Deadline [Doc. No. #3 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 9/30/2020. (anh)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Continue Defendant County of San Diego's Responsive Pleading Deadline by County of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Vilaseca, Christina)Attorney Christina Isabel Vilaseca added to party County of San Diego(pty:dft) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against County of San Diego, Gustafson, DOES 1-10, filed by Miguel Lucas. (Filing fee $400.00 - receipt number ACASDC-14449767) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1735-CAB-JLB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Pena, Danielle)[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
