Merhi v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
Joseph Merhi |
Does 1-50 and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC |
3:2021cv00446 |
March 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Mitchell D Dembin |
Dana M Sabraw |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Joint Stipulation and Motion for Order Voluntarily Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 5/3/2021. (ag) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Order Voluntarily Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Smith, Katherine) (mme). |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting #8 Joint Stipulation and Motion for Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant may file a response to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before May 3, 2021. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/15/2021. (mme) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Christina Marie Lucio on behalf of Joseph Merhi (Lucio, Christina)Attorney Christina Marie Lucio added to party Joseph Merhi(pty:pla) (mme). |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Smith, Katherine) (mme). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing of Notice of Removal of Class Action With the Superior Court by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Smith, Katherine) (mme). |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Joint Stipulation and Motion for Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation and Motion for Order Extending Defendants Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby orders that Defendant may file a response to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before April 19, 2021. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 3/18/2021. (mme) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Smith, Katherine)Attorney Katherine V. A. Smith added to party Lowe's Home Centers, LLC(pty:dft) (mme). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC . (Smith, Katherine) (mme). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC . Identifying Corporate Parent Lowe's Companies, Inc., Other Affiliate Lowe's Home Centers, LLC for Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. (Smith, Katherine) (mme). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Lowe's Companies, Inc. for Lowe's Home Centers, LLC.. (Smith, Katherine) (mme). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15514090.), filed by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, Does 1-50. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Casey Morales in Support of Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC's Notice of Removal of Class Action, #3 Declaration of Katherine V.A. Smith in Support of Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC's Notice of Removal of Class Action, #4 Table of Contents of Exhibits to Declaration of Katherine V.A. Smith, #5 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:21-cv-446-DMS-MDD. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(zda) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.