Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell |
CDCR Director and Rob Bonta |
3:2021cv01261 |
July 12, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
Mitchell D Dembin |
Janis L Sammartino |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 USCA Case Number 21-55971 for #4 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell. (akr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell as to #3 Order. Fee not paid, IFP Motion attached. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Appeal IFP (directed to US Court of Appeals)). (In #3 Order, the US District Court declined to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The documents were received by the Clerk of the US Court of Appeals on 9/3/2021 and were forwarded to the Clerk of the US District Court for processing. Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell. (jms)(jrd) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against CDCR Director, Rob Bonta, filed by Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1261-JLS-MDD. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.