ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc. et al
| ImprimisRx, LLC |
| OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01305 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Linda Lopez |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by ImprimisRx, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Harrow Health, Inc. for ImprimisRx, LLC.. (Wesley, Keith) (jmo).
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ekb) (jms).
|
|
Filing 2
REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *5,542,813*, *5,505,057*, *5,505,058*, *5,577,593*, *6,149,792*, *5,577,593*, *5,117,425*, *5,505,056*, *PRED-MOXI-BROM - Registration Pending* cc:USPTO (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ekb) (jms).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against OSRX, Inc., Ocular Science, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15941781.), filed by ImprimisRx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1305-BAS-LL. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Wesley, Keith)(ekb) (jms).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
