Gauthier v. Unknown
Bertho Payton Gauthier |
Unknown, -, Warden R. Johnson and Xavier Becerra |
3:2021cv01706 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
William V Gallo |
Janis L Sammartino |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Fee for Habeas Petition: Paid on 11/22/2021. (receipt notes incorrect case number due to error, payment applied to this case)(jms) (jms). |
Filing 3 AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against Xavier Becerra, R. Johnson, filed by Bertho Payton Gauthier. (jms) |
Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without Prejudice and with Leave to Amend. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must, no later than 12/21/2021, file a First Amended Petition that cures the pleading deficiencies. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/15/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service and blank 2254 First Amended Petition sent to Petitioner.) (tcf) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Unknown, filed by Bertho Payton Gauthier. (Filing fee $5.00 - receipt number CAS132904) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1706-JLS-WVG. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(jms) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/5/2021) (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.