Whaley et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Andrew Whaley and Magdalena Whaley |
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Does 1 through 100 |
3:2021cv01985 |
November 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Marilyn L Huff |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 pl |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 16 PRO HAC APPROVED: Stephen E. Marshall appearing for Defendants Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 15 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-16464824.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Marshall, Stephen) (rmc). |
![]() |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. (Perkins, Roger) (dxf). |
Filing 12 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-16427625.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Lear, Bradford) (rmc). |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (First Amended Complaint) against All Defendants, filed by Andrew Whaley, Magdalena Whaley. (Attachments: #1 Redline comparing original Complaint with First Amended Complaint) (Meyer, Anthony) (dxf). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing First Amended Complaint by Andrew Whaley, Magdalena Whaley re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Meyer, Anthony) (dxf). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Meyer on behalf of Andrew Whaley, Magdalena Whaley (Meyer, Anthony)Attorney Anthony J. Meyer added to party Andrew Whaley(pty:pla), Attorney Anthony J. Meyer added to party Magdalena Whaley (pty:pla)(dxf). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Je Yon Jung (Jung, Je Yon) (dxf). |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION to Continue Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and Modified Briefing Schedule by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. (Attachments: #1 (Proposed) Order)(Perkins, Roger)Attorney Roger G. Perkins added to party Merck & Co., Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Roger G. Perkins added to party Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.(pty:dft) QC Mailer, re Proposed Orders should be emailed (dxf). |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. In Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Taylor, Carolyn) (dxf). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit)(Taylor, Carolyn) (dxf). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(d) by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Taylor, Carolyn) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., identifying Corporate Parent Merck & Co., Inc. (ggv)(jrd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16349173.), filed by Andrew Whaley, Magdalena Whaley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Index of Exhibits, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Request for Judicial Notice)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1985-H-BLM. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(ggv)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.