Chien v. Bumble Inc. et al
Ryan Chien |
Bumble Inc. and Buzz Holdings L.P. |
3:2022cv00020 |
January 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
Nita L Stormes |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1453 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Answer due 3/18/2022.Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/24/2022. (axc) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P.. (Patel, Purvi) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. . Identifying Other Affiliate The Blackstone Group Inc. for Bumble Inc.. (Patel, Purvi) (dlg). |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. identifying Other Affiliate The Blackstone Group Inc. for Bumble Inc... (Patel, Purvi) |
Filing 11 PRO HAC APPROVED: Katie Louise Viggiani appearing for Defendants Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-16512729.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Viggiani, Katie) (rmc). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance Notice of Special Appearance of Erin P. Lupfer on Behalf of Defendants by Erin P. Lupfer on behalf of Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. (Lupfer, Erin)Attorney Erin P. Lupfer added to party Bumble Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Erin P. Lupfer added to party Buzz Holdings L.P.(pty:dft) (dlg). |
Filing 8 ORDER Denying the Pro Hac Vice Application of Katie Viggiani, re #7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/25/2022.(rmc) |
Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-16504182.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Viggiani, Katie) (rmc). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance Notice Of Special Appearance Of Purvi G. Patel On Behalf Of Defendants Bumble Inc. And Buzz Holdings L.P. by Purvi G. Patel on behalf of Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. (Patel, Purvi)Attorney Purvi G. Patel added to party Bumble Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Purvi G. Patel added to party Buzz Holdings L.P.(pty:dft)(dlg). |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting Joint Motion #4 to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint to March 4, 2022. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/13/22. (dlg) |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P.. (Cheung, Tiffany) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Cheung, Tiffany) (anh). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tiffany Cheung on behalf of Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. (jrd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16457881.), filed by Bumble Inc., Buzz Holdings L.P. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 Tiffany Cheung Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 Kate Urquiola Declaration)The new case number is 3:22-cv-20-GPC-NLS. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.(jrd) (Attachment 2 replaced on 1/6/2022) (jrd). (Attachment 3 replaced on 1/6/2022) (jrd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.