Sarcuni et al v. bZx DAO et al
Christian Sarcuni, Pedro Cunha, Alexander Lloyd, Marc Simon, Pilici Rustam, Daniel Lu, Clment Omtek, Edison Ho, Paolo Leite, Miras Issakhov, Shuai Lu, Sooraj Narayanan, Hctor Albert Gonzlez Terrn, Mannu Singh and Simon Schmid |
bZx DAO, Kyle Kistner, Tom Bean, Hashed International LLC, Age Crypto LLC, Ooki DAO, Leveragebox LLC, bZeroX LLC and AGE Crypto GP LLC |
Skliar Viktor, Kiro Aleksandrov, Jonas Wernecke, Daniele Penna, Clement Ometek and Marc-Julien Lie |
3:2022cv00618 |
May 2, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Larry Alan Burns |
Daniel E Butcher |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.