Benedict v. Comenity Servicing, LLC
Adrian Benedict |
Comenity Servicing, LLC |
3:2022cv00773 |
May 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Karen S Crawford |
Dana M Sabraw |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 fc Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed by the parties, the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and the Case Management Conference have been taken off calendar. A telephonic Settlement Disposition Conference has been scheduled for 9/30/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. To participate in the conference, counsel must dial the toll free number: 1-877-873-8017; enter the Access Code: 2924630 (participants will then be put on hold until the Court activates the conference call); and when prompted, press * to bypass the Security Code. The Court will VACATE the conference if the parties file the appropriate dismissal papers before 9/30/2022.(no document attached) (plh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Adrian Benedict (Friedman, Todd) (jpp). |
Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2022 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Joint Discovery Plan due 8/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 6/10/2022.(jrm) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Comenity Servicing, LLC.(Searles, Nathan) (jpp). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Comenity Servicing, LLC of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal (Searles, Nathan) (jpp). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Comenity Servicing, LLC . Identifying Corporate Parent Comenity LLC, Corporate Parent Bread Financial Holdings, Inc, Other Affiliate Comenity Bank for Comenity Servicing, LLC. (Searles, Nathan) (jpp). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-16863357.), filed by Comenity Servicing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:22-cv-773-DMS-KSC. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(cxt)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Benedict v. Comenity Servicing, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adrian Benedict | |
Represented By: | Adrian R Bacon |
Represented By: | Thomas Edward Wheeler |
Represented By: | Todd M. Friedman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Comenity Servicing, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nathan Andrew Searles |
Represented By: | Tomio B Narita |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.