Rodriguez v. Kohl's, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kimberlyn Rodriguez
Defendant: Kohl's, Inc. and Does 1-50
Case Number: 3:2022cv01079
Filed: July 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: William V Gallo
Referring Judge: Janis L Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (1) Approving Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (2) Dismissing Entire Action with Prejudice (ECF No. #5 ). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/20/2022. (tcf)
October 18, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Kohl's, Inc.. (Beverlin, Amy) (alns).
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #3 Joint Motion to Extend Defendant Kohl's, Inc.'s Time to Respond to Initial Complaint. Plaintiff SHALL FILE any motion to remand on or before 8/22/2022. Defendant SHALL RESPOND to the Complaint either: (1) thirty (30) days after entry of the Court's order denying Plaintiff's contemplated motion to remand; or (2) on or before 9/27/2022, should Plaintiff fail to file a motion to remand on or before 8/22/2022. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/28/2022. (tcf)
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply of Defendant Kohl's, Inc. to Initial Complaint by Kohl's, Inc. (Kim, Sylvia) (tcf).
July 22, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Kohl's, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent Kohl's Corporation for Kohl's, Inc. (mef)(jrd)
July 22, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-17017413.), filed by Kohl's, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover sheet, #2 Declaration Declaration of Sylvia J Kim, #3 Supplement Superior Court Ex Parte Application, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G) The new case number is 3:22-cv-1079-JLS-WVG. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (mef)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Kohl's, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberlyn Rodriguez
Represented By: Lauren Nicole Vega
Represented By: Nicholas J. Ferraro
Represented By: Rick A. Waltman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's, Inc.
Represented By: Amy E. Beverlin
Represented By: Kerri Haru Sakaue
Represented By: Matthew Charles Kane
Represented By: Sylvia Jihae Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?