Hernandez v. Gamboa et al
| Carlos Hernandez |
| M. Gamboa and Rob Bonta |
| 3:2022cv01111 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Transfer Letter Received from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case number in other court is 22 cv01371 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: * Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 Twelfth Street**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(fth) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Rob Bonta, M. Gamboa (Filing fee $5, fee not paid, IFP not filed.), filed by Carlos Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Contents and Authorities, #3 State Supreme Court Decision, #4 Appendix Court of Appeal Opinion)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1111-BAS-BGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
