Robinson v. Madden et al
| Rayvone Robinson |
| Raymond Madden, J. Gallegos, Frank Sharpe and Kathleen Allison |
| 3:2022cv01401 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Rayvone Robinson, as to Frank Sharpe. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(smy1)
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Rayvone Robinson, as to J. Gallegos. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(smy1)
|
|
Filing 8
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Rayvone Robinson. (smy1)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(jmo)
|
|
Filing 6
Order 1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ); 2) Denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #3 ); 3) Dismissing Claims and Defendants; and 4) Directing US Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint Upon Remaining Defendants Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P.4(c)(3). Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/19/22. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service with Certified copy and CCDR) (Certified Copy to USM) (jmo)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel Accepting Document: Initiating Documents, from Plaintiff Rayvone Robinson. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: General Order 653A: Rules of Procedure for the Electronic Submission of Litigation for Plaintiffs Incarcerated at Certain Identified CDCR Facilities Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/19/22.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (smy1)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rayvone Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Request for Hearing)(smy1)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rayvone Robinson. (smy1)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Kathleen Allison, J. Gallegos, Raymond Madden, Frank Sharpe (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Rayvone Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1401-GPC-DEB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
