Patton v. Rey et al
| Arnold Patton |
| Anthony Rey, Sonia L. Manning, Montgomery and County of San Diego |
| 3:2022cv02028 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against County of San Diego, Sonia L. Manning, Montgomery, Anthony Rey, filed by Arnold Patton. (smy1) |
Filing 3
ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF No. #2 ]; and (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/17/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arnold Patton. (smy1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of San Diego, Sonia L. Manning, Montgomery, Anthony Rey (Filing fee $ 402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Arnold Patton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-2028-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
