Ethridge v. Perales et al
Carl Ethridge |
H. Perales, Sean Masterson and Dr. Kingston |
3:2023cv00763 |
April 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
William V Gallo |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Order 1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; 2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and for Seeking Monetary Damages Against Defendants who are Immune; 3) Denying Request for Appointment of Counsel; and 4) Denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Dkt. Nos. #2 , #3 , #4 ). In the event Plaintiff seeks to file an amended complaint, he must do so no later than 6/1/23. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/5/23. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Carl Ethridge. (bdc) (Main Document 4 replaced on 4/26/2023) (bdc). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Carl Ethridge. (bdc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Ethridge. (bdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Kingston, Sean Masterson, H. Perales, IFP Filed, filed by Carl Ethridge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-763-GPC-WVG. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(bdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.