Emas v. Roman
Defendant: United States of America
Petitioner: Nicholas Emas
Respondent: Jaime I. Roman
Case Number: 3:2023cv02194
Filed: November 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: David D Leshner
Referring Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Granting Joint Motion to Stay re #7 . Case stayed until 4/18/2024. Answer by Respondent due 4/22/2024 Traverse by Petitioner due 5/13/2024. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/22/2024. (dim)
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Amend Scheduling Order by United States of America. (Wong, Stephen) (bdc).
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Setting Briefing Schedule: Answer by Respondent due 1/22/2024 Traverse by Petitioner due 2/12/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on 12/11/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen H. Wong on behalf of United States of America (Wong, Stephen)Attorney Stephen H. Wong added to party United States of America(pty:dft) (sjt).
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Referral Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/4/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRO HAC APPROVED: Tami L. Mitchell appearing for Petitioner Nicholas Emas (no document attached) (rmc)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 224 receipt number ACASDC-18391846.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Mitchell, Tami) (rmc).
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Jaime I. Roman (Filing fee $5 - receipt number ACASDC-18387869), filed by Nicholas Emas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appendix I, #3 Appendix II)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2194-BTM-DDL. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Sullivan, Jeremiah)[Case in Screening] (jms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emas v. Roman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nicholas Emas
Represented By: Jeremiah J Sullivan, III
Represented By: Tami L. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jaime I. Roman
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Stephen H. Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?