Alvidres v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Tammy Alvidres
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Case Number: 3:2024cv01452
Filed: August 15, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Michael S Berg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Tarn on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Tarn, Jennifer)Attorney Jennifer Tarn added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft) (anh).
September 10, 2024 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg is no longer assigned as presiding judge. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg for all further proceedings. The new case number is 24cv1452-CAB-MSB.(no document attached) (sjt)
September 10, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft) (rxc).
September 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Kira Treyvus, re #3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 8/30/2024.(exs)
August 29, 2024 Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 224 receipt number ACASDC-19141093.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Treyvus, Kira) (exs).
August 15, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Michael S. Berg has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel are hereby notified of plaintiff's right to consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Provided, as an attachment to this notice, is a consent/declination form for plaintiff to complete. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. The Notice of Electronic Filing of the complaint sent by the court to the Commissioner suffices for service of the complaint. The Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (stn) (anh).
August 15, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-19104504.), filed by Tammy Alvidres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1452-MSB. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg is assigned to the case. (Michael Chen)(stn) (anh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvidres v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Katherine L. Parker
Represented By: Jennifer Tarn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Alvidres
Represented By: Michael C. Chen
Represented By: Kira Treyvus
Represented By: Kira Treyvus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?