Raab v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Benjamin Raab
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Case Number: 3:2024cv01731
Filed: September 27, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Benjamin J Cheeks
Referring Judge: Linda Lopez
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Marriott on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Marriott, Michael)Attorney Michael Marriott added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft) (ddf).
October 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis And Screening Complaint [ECF Nos. #1 , #2 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks on 10/29/2024. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ddf)
October 22, 2024 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER. Magistrate Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks is no longer assigned as presiding judge. Case reassigned to Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks for all further proceedings. The new case number is 24cv1731-LL-BJC.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (sjt)
October 2, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft) (rxc).
September 27, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Benjamin J. Cheeks has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel are hereby notified of plaintiff's right to consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Provided, as an attachment to this notice, is a consent/declination form for plaintiff to complete. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. Pro Se Plaintiff notified via mail of electronic service of the complaint by the court on Commissioner of Social Security Administration. The Notice of Electronic Filing sent by the court to the Commissioner suffices for service of the complaint. The Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (axc1)
September 27, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Benjamin Raab. (axc1)
September 27, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley, IFP Filed, filed by Benjamin Raab. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1731-BJC. Magistrate Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks is assigned to the case.(axc1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raab v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Raab
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Michael Marriott
Represented By: Katherine L. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?