Reiley et al v. Saldana et al
| Adrian Reiley, Nadiah Reiley and CureTube |
| Santino Saldana and Cure Lids |
| 3:2025cv00106 |
| January 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cure Lids, Santino Saldana, filed by Adrian Reiley, Nadiah Reiley. (jpp) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *11,230,414*, *11,814,218 B2* cc:USPTO (yxc) (sjt). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (yxc) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Documents by Adrian Reiley, Nadiah Reiley, CureTube. (yxc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cure Lids, Santino Saldana ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 158494.), filed by Adrian Reiley, CureTube, Nadiah Reiley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope)The new case number is 3:25-cv-106-RBM-VET. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case.(yxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
