Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
Plaintiff: Dean M. Stevens
Defendant: CDCR Director, CMO Chief Medical Doctors and Chief Dentist (C.W.P.)
Case Number: 3:2025cv00191
Filed: January 24, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison H Goddard
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2025 Filing 4 Case transferred in from the Northern District of California; Case Number 5:24-cv-08980-EJD. Original file received electronically.
January 24, 2025 Filing 5 District Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard assigned to transfer case from the Northern District of California. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (ggv)(jrd)
January 24, 2025 Case electronically transferred to the Southern District of California (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2025) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/27/2025.]
January 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER - Out to the Southern District of California. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/17/2025. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff [Transferred from California Northern on 1/27/2025.]
December 12, 2024 Filing 2 APPLICATION AND DECLARATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dean M. Stevens. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/27/2025.]
December 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT UNDER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 42 u.s.c. 1983 (no process) against CDCR Director, CMO Chief Medical Doctors, Chief Dentist (C.W.P.), (Filing Fee: ifpp entered 12/12/2024). Filed by Dean M. Stevens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1, #2 Exhibits 2, #3 Exhibits 3, #4 Envelope)(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2024) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/27/2025.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dean M. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDCR Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CMO Chief Medical Doctors
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief Dentist (C.W.P.)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?