<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>US, et al v. Guidant Corporation, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca1/12-1867</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca1/12-1867/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 03:07:08 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 03:07:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>US, et al v. Guidant Corporation, et al - Case Documents</description>
             
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 106536570]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/12-1867/106536570
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                OPINION issued by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Norman H. Stahl, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge. Published. For the aforementioned reasons, the district court's dismissal of Heineman-Guta's amended complaint due to the first-tofile rule under 3730(b)(5) is affirmed. The parties shall bear their own costs. [12-1867]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/12-1867/106536570
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
