Lopez-Munoz, et al v. Triple-S Salud

Defendant - Appellee: TRIPLE-S SALUD
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAQUEL LOPEZ and ORLANDO RIOS
Case Number: 13-1417
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
May 9, 2014 Summary Lopez-Munoz v. Triple-S Salud, Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 9, 2014 106686340 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge and Kermit V. Lipez, Appellate Judge. Published. [13-1417]
Search for this case: Lopez-Munoz, et al v. Triple-S Salud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: TRIPLE-S SALUD
Represented By: Cesar T. Alcover-Acosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RAQUEL LOPEZ
Represented By: Jose O. Vazquez-Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ORLANDO RIOS
Represented By: Jose O. Vazquez-Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.