US v. Rose
| UNITED STATES |
| RUSSELL C. ROSE, a/k/a Baby Russell, a/k/a Double R, a/k/a Baby Boy |
| 13-1525 |
| April 25, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106896206
ERRATA issued by court to opinion (published) [5938555-2]. [13-1525, 13-1683, 13-2420, 13-2460]
|
|
Filing
106890634
OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge and William J. Kayatta , Jr., Appellate Judge. Published. [13-1525, 13-1683, 13-2420, 13-2460]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Rose | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | James E. Arnold |
| Represented By: | Dina Michael Chaitowitz |
| Represented By: | David J. D'Addio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: RUSSELL C. ROSE, a/k/a Baby Russell, a/k/a Double R, a/k/a Baby Boy | |
| Represented By: | Rudolph Findley Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
