Shul-Navarro v. Holder
| JUAN CARLOS SHUL-NAVARRO |
| ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General |
| 13-2271 |
| October 9, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Shul-Navarro v. Holder
|
| Shul-Navarro v. Holder |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106735776
ERRATA issued by court to opinion (published) [5844816-2]. [13-2271]
|
|
Filing
106725102
OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge and David J. Barron, Appellate Judge. Published. [13-2271]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shul-Navarro v. Holder | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS SHUL-NAVARRO | |
| Represented By: | Michael Haven |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | LaTia N. Bing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
