Wang v. Holder
Petitioner: REI FENG WANG
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Case Number: 14-1845
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 31, 2015 Summary Wang v. Lynch

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106871560 ERRATA issued by court to opinion (published) [5926770-2]. [14-1845]
July 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106869919 OPINION issued by Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge; Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge. Published. [14-1845]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Wang v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: REI FENG WANG
Represented By: Michael A.O. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Represented By: LaTia N. Bing
Represented By: Melissa Katherine Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?