US v. Dunston
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES DUNSTON, a/k/a Speedro
Case Number: 15-1812
Filed: July 13, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 15, 2017 Summary United States v. Dunston

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 107129479 OPINION issued by David J. Barron, Appellate Judge; David H. Souter,* Associate Supreme Court Justice and Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge. Published. *Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation. [15-1812, 15-1999, 15-2000]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Dunston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Dina Michael Chaitowitz
Represented By: Cory S. Flashner
Represented By: Greg A. Friedholm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JAMES DUNSTON, a/k/a Speedro
Represented By: Daniel J. Cloherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?