Bautista Cayman Asset Company v. AMPPR
| UNITED STATES |
| BAUTISTA CAYMAN ASSET COMPANY |
| ASOCIACION DE MIEMBROS DE LA POLICIA DE PUERTO RICO, a/k/a La Asociacion de Miembros de la Policia de Puerto Rico |
| 20-1445 |
| April 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Bautista Cayman Asset Co. v. Asociacion De Miembros De La Policía De Puerto Rico
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/22/2020 for appellant Asociacion de Miembros de la Policia de Puerto Rico. Appendix due 06/22/2020 for appellant Asociacion de Miembros de la Policia de Puerto Rico. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1445] (RMK) [Entered: 05/13/2020 09:48 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant AMPPR. Certificate of service dated 04/20/2020. [20-1445] (ID) [Entered: 04/20/2020 03:56 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant AMPPR filed by Attorney Ivan Diaz Lopez. Certificate of service dated 04/20/2020. [20-1445] (ID) [Entered: 04/20/2020 03:54 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #78) filed by Appellant AMPPR. Docketing Statement and Appearance Form due 04/30/2020.[20-1445] (RMK) [Entered: 04/16/2020 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
