Hudson v. Kelly
Petitioner / Appellant: MAC S. HUDSON
Respondent / Appellee: JOHN MARSHALL, JR. and SHEILA KELLY
Case Number: 21-1899
Filed: November 9, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 5, 2024 Summary Hudson v. Kelly

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2021 Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Mac S. Hudson was granted in the district court by order dated 12/14/2021. [21-1899] (DO) [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:15 PM]
December 15, 2021 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: Electronic order dated 12/14/2021 granting in forma pauperis on appeal. [21-1899] (DO) [Entered: 12/15/2021 12:14 PM]
December 7, 2021 MOTION to extend time to request an expanded certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mac S. Hudson. Certificate of service dated 12/07/2021. [21-1899] (ADC) [Entered: 12/07/2021 03:24 PM]
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to request expanded certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mac S. Hudson. Application for expanded CAP due 01/24/2022. [21-1899] (GAK) [Entered: 12/07/2021 04:44 PM]
November 23, 2021 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Sheila Kelly filed by Attorney Eva M. Badway. Certificate of service dated 11/23/2021. [21-1899] (EMB) [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:08 PM]
November 23, 2021 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Mac S. Hudson indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 11/23/2021. [21-1899] (ADC) [Entered: 11/23/2021 02:06 PM]
November 23, 2021 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Mac S. Hudson. Certificate of service dated 11/23/2021. [21-1899] (ADC) [Entered: 11/23/2021 01:58 PM]
November 23, 2021 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Mac S. Hudson filed by Attorney Alan D. Campbell. Certificate of service dated 11/23/2021. [21-1899] (ADC) [Entered: 11/23/2021 02:05 PM]
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER allowing appellant to apply for an expanded certificate of appealability. Expanded CAP due 12/20/2021. [21-1899] (GRC) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:04 PM]
November 9, 2021 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #96) filed by Appellant Mac S. Hudson. Appearance form due 11/23/2021. Docketing Statement due 11/23/2021. [21-1899] (GRC) [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hudson v. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MAC S. HUDSON
Represented By: Alan D. Campbell
Represented By: Mac S. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JOHN MARSHALL, JR.
Represented By: Eva Marie Badway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SHEILA KELLY
Represented By: Eva Marie Badway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?