Thomas v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
NICOLE ANDERSON and KEVIN GARABEDIAN |
SHAUN THOMAS |
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC |
23-1121 |
February 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Foreclosure |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Shaun Thomas. Served on 04/05/2023. [23-1121] (TSD) [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:45 AM] |
![]() |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 04/10/2023 for appellant Shaun Thomas. Appendix due 04/10/2023 for appellant Shaun Thomas. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1121] (CMP) [Entered: 02/27/2023 10:10 AM] |
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Shaun Thomas. Served on 02/20/2023. [23-1121] (TSD) [Entered: 02/20/2023 02:55 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Shaun Thomas filed by Attorney Todd S Dion. Served on 02/20/2023. [23-1121] (TSD) [Entered: 02/20/2023 02:54 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC filed by Attorney Christian B.W. Stephens. Served on 02/09/2023. [23-1121] (CBS) [Entered: 02/09/2023 11:31 AM] |
DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC. Served on 02/09/2023. [23-1121] (CBS) [Entered: 02/09/2023 11:36 AM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #58) filed by Appellant Shaun Thomas. Docketing Statement due 02/21/2023. Transcript Report/Order form due 02/21/2023. Appearance form due 02/21/2023. [23-1121] (CMP) [Entered: 02/06/2023 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.