Burlington Northern Santa Fe R v. Gallatin, et al
| BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation |
| A 50-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT CONSISTING OF 6.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS, OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY: TOWNSHIP 48 NORTH, RANGE 70 WEST: SECTION 20: NW1/4SW1/4; SW1/4NW1/4; SE1/4NW1/4; SW1/4NE1/4; SE1/4NE1/4; NE1/4NE1/4 IN CAMPBELL COUNTY, WYOMING, a |
| GALLATIN FUELS INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, MARJORIE W GALLET, AKA Marjorie W. Whyel, J. ALLEN WHYEL and H. SCOTT WHYEL |
| 09-8003 |
| January 9, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Land Condemnation |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Burlington Northern Santa Fe R v. Gallatin, et al |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
920090904
Opinion
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Burlington Northern Santa Fe R v. Gallatin, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff-counter-defendant - appellee: BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | Kristin M. Nuss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: A 50-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT CONSISTING OF 6.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS, OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY: TOWNSHIP 48 NORTH, RANGE 70 WEST: SECTION 20: NW1/4SW1/4; SW1/4NW1/4; SE1/4NW1/4; SW1/4NE1/4; SE1/4NE1/4; NE1/4NE1/4 IN CAMPBELL COUNTY, WYOMING, a | |
| Represented By: | Paul S. Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant-counter-claimant - appellant: GALLATIN FUELS INC., a Pennsylvania corporation | |
| Represented By: | James L. Edwards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant-counter-claimant - appellant: MARJORIE W GALLET, AKA Marjorie W. Whyel | |
| Represented By: | James L. Edwards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant-counter-claimant - appellant: J. ALLEN WHYEL | |
| Represented By: | James L. Edwards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant-counter-claimant - appellant: H. SCOTT WHYEL | |
| Represented By: | James L. Edwards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
