Chevron Mining Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America
| CHEVRON MINING INC., FKA Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co. |
| UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 1307 |
| 10-8074 |
| September 9, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Labor/Management Relations Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Chevron Mining Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1008693258
[9893103] Affirmed. Terminated on the merits after oral hearing. Written, signed, published. Judges Kelly, authoring; Baldock; and Lucero. Mandate to issue.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Chevron Mining Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff-counter-defendant - appellant: CHEVRON MINING INC., FKA Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co. | |
| Represented By: | Bradley T. Cave |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant-counter-claimant - appellee: UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 1307 | |
| Represented By: | Alan W. Mortensen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
