TKO Energy Services v. M-I
| TKO ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company |
| M-I L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, DBA M-1 Swaco, DBA Federal Wholesale Drilling Mud |
| 13-5028 |
| March 13, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Antitrust |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: TKO Energy Services v. M-I | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: TKO ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Adrienne Barnett |
| Represented By: | John E. Dowdell |
| Represented By: | Jo Lynn Jeter |
| Represented By: | Ryan A. Ray |
| Represented By: | Joel Wohlgemuth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: M-I L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, DBA M-1 Swaco, DBA Federal Wholesale Drilling Mud | |
| Represented By: | Steven Adams |
| Represented By: | Greg A. Castro |
| Represented By: | Sofia R. Nagda |
| Represented By: | Ryan Andrew Pittman |
| Represented By: | Charles R. Willing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
