Smith v. Whetsel, et al
| FRANKLIN C. SMITH |
| JOHN WHETSEL, Sheriff, Officially and COMMISSIONERS AND CITY OF OKLAHOMA POLICYMAKERS, pursuant to: Canton v Harris 489. US 378 (1989) as proper Defendants |
| 17-6087 |
| April 25, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Smith v. Whetsel, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: FRANKLIN C. SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Franklin C. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: JOHN WHETSEL, Sheriff, Officially | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: COMMISSIONERS AND CITY OF OKLAHOMA POLICYMAKERS, pursuant to: Canton v Harris 489. US 378 (1989) as proper Defendants | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
