United States v. Mateo-Miguel
| TOMAS MIGUEL MATEO-MIGUEL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-2153 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10780669] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/22/2020. Docketing statement, transcript order form, designation of record and entry of appearance due 11/05/2020 for Tomas Miguel Mateo-Miguel. Notice of appearance due on 11/05/2020 for United States of America. Appointment motion due 11/05/2020 by Tomas Miguel Mateo-Miguel [20-2153] [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Mateo-Miguel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: TOMAS MIGUEL MATEO-MIGUEL | |
| Represented By: | Pedro Pineda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Matilda McCarthy Villalobos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
