Woods v. Ross, et al
| EPHRAIM WOODS, JR. |
| KENDRA ROSS and CHERYL ROSS |
| 21-3163 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10864258] Default; Procedural termination without judicial action. [21-3163] [Entered: 10/12/2021 10:40 AM] |
| [10864259] Mandate issued. [21-3163] [Entered: 10/12/2021 10:41 AM] |
| [10860720] Entry of appearance filed by Anand V. Ramana for Kendra Ross. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 09/24/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-3163] [Entered: 09/27/2021 08:09 AM] |
| [10860681] Entry of appearance submitted by Anand Vijay Ramana for Appellee Kendra Ross for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 09/24/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-3163] --[Edited 09/27/2021 by SLS to remove PDF from docket entry as the document has been filed.] AVR [Entered: 09/24/2021 07:13 PM] |
| [10857163] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. Briefing on the merits is tolled pending further order of the court. The court is considering this case for summary disposition under 10 Cir. R. 27. Appellant's memorandum brief due 09/27/2021 for Ephraim Woods Jr. See order for additional information. Served on 09/13/2021. [21-3163] [Entered: 09/13/2021 11:17 AM] |
| [10856790] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/09/2021 Fee or ifp forms due 10/12/2021 for Ephraim Woods Jr. Notice of appearance due on 09/24/2021 for Kendra Ross, and Notice of appearance due on 10/12/2021 for Ephraim Woods Jr. [21-3163] [Entered: 09/10/2021 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
