Mendez-Benhumea v. Rosen
Petitioner: FAUSTINO MENDEZ-BENHUMEA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, United States Attorney General
Case Number: 21-9503
Filed: January 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 [10798974] Entry of appearance filed by Sherease Rosalyn Pratt for Jeffrey Rosen. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 01/11/2021. Manner of Service: email. [21-9503] [Entered: 01/11/2021 01:42 PM]
January 11, 2021 [10798967] Entry of appearance submitted by Sherease Rosalyn Pratt for Respondent Jeffrey Rosen for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 01/11/2021. Manner of Service: email. --[Edited 01/11/2021 by SDS to remove pdf from entry as the pleading has been filed] [21-9503] SRP [Entered: 01/11/2021 01:38 PM]
January 11, 2021 [10798944] Order filed by Clerk of the Court - On our own motion, the court will procedurally consolidate case 20-9573 and 21-9503. After the preliminary filing requirements are satisfied for Case No. 21-9503, all future filings shall be captioned for and filed in both cases. Briefing on the merits will begin after the agency record is filed in 21-9503. See order for details. Served on 01/11/2021. [20-9573, 21-9503] [Entered: 01/11/2021 01:22 PM]
January 8, 2021 This entry has been removed from the docket.as the pdf was for case 20-9580. Petitioner must refile the and attach the correct document. [JJH] [10798674] Status report filed by Faustino Mendez-Benhumea in 20-9573. Served on 01/08/2021. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required (privacy, paper copy and virus) certifications: Yes. [20-9573, 21-9503] CD [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:32 PM]
January 8, 2021 [10798664] Petition for review filed. Served on 01/08/2021. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, Oil, Pratt, Tyler. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 01/08/2021 letter. Docketing statement due 01/22/2021 for Faustino Mendez-Benhumea. Fee is due by 01/22/2021 for Faustino Mendez-Benhumea. Agency record due 02/17/2021 for Jeffrey Rosen. Notice of appearance due on 01/22/2021 for Jeffrey Rosen and Faustino Mendez-Benhumea [21-9503] [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mendez-Benhumea v. Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, United States Attorney General
Represented By: Sherease Rosalyn Pratt
Represented By: Lansing W. Tyler
Represented By: DOH/EOIR/BIA
Represented By: Oil Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FAUSTINO MENDEZ-BENHUMEA
Represented By: Catharine Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?