Gonzales v. Watkins & Shepard Trucking
| CARLOS GONZALES |
| WATKINS & SHEPARD TRUCKING, INC. |
| 26-8025 |
| June 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11287522] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/03/2026. Docketing statement, transcript order form and notice of appearance due 06/18/2026 for Carlos Gonzales. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 06/18/2026 for Watkins & Shepard Trucking, Inc. [26-8025] [Entered: 06/04/2026 08:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gonzales v. Watkins & Shepard Trucking | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CARLOS GONZALES | |
| Represented By: | Arnold Anderson Vickery |
| Represented By: | Fred H. Shepherd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WATKINS & SHEPARD TRUCKING, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Edelman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.