USA v. William Douglas
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM LUTHER DOUGLAS
Case Number: 13-10975
Filed: March 6, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2013 Mandate issued as to Appellant William Luther Douglas. [Entered: 10/09/2013 02:55 PM]
September 9, 2013 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant William Luther Douglas. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. [Entered: 09/09/2013 02:44 PM]
September 9, 2013 Judgment entered as to Appellant William Luther Douglas. [Entered: 09/09/2013 02:51 PM]
June 12, 2013 Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellee USA. [Entered: 06/17/2013 11:03 AM]
June 12, 2013 Supplemental Expanded Record Excerpts [1 VOLUMES - 2 sets] filed by Attorney R. Brian Tanner for Appellee USA. Service date: 06/11/2013 email - Attorney for Appellant: McCullough; Attorney for Appellees: Solari, Tanner; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Durham, Rafferty, Tarver. [Entered: 06/17/2013 11:04 AM]
June 12, 2013 Appellant's PSI for the Electronic ROA Program filed by Attorney R. Brian Tanner for Appellee USA. [Entered: 06/17/2013 11:04 AM]
June 11, 2013 Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee USA. Service date: 06/11/2013 US mail - Attorney for Appellant: McCullough; email - Attorney for Appellant: McCullough; Attorney for Appellee: Tanner. (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 06/11/2013 03:27 PM]
June 5, 2013 Received corrected paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant William Luther Douglas. [Entered: 06/11/2013 03:27 PM]
June 4, 2013 Corrected Appellant's Brief filed by Appellant William Luther Douglas. Service date: 06/04/2013 US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Solari, Tanner. (ECF: Hugh McCullough) [Entered: 06/04/2013 03:51 PM]
May 22, 2013 Notice of deficient Appellant brief filed by Attorney Hugh J. McCullough for Appellant William Luther Douglas.Deficiencies: No Table of Record References,. [Entered: 05/22/2013 10:28 AM]
May 22, 2013 Notice of deficient Appellant record excerpts filed by Attorney Hugh J. McCullough for Appellant William Luther Douglas. Deficiencies: No Table of Record References,. [Entered: 05/22/2013 10:31 AM]
May 14, 2013 Corrected expanded record excerpts received on 06/05/2013 from Appellant William Luther Douglas. All deficiencies have been corrected. [Entered: 06/11/2013 03:28 PM]
May 14, 2013 Expanded Record Excerpts filed [1 VOLUMES - 5 sets] by Attorney Hugh J. McCullough for Appellant William Luther Douglas. Deficiencies: No Table of Record References,. Service date: 05/13/2013 US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Durham, Rafferty, Tarver; email - Attorney for Appellees: Solari, Tanner. [Entered: 05/22/2013 10:30 AM]
May 14, 2013 Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant William Luther Douglas. [Entered: 05/22/2013 10:27 AM]
May 13, 2013 Appellant's brief filed by William Luther Douglas. Service date: 05/13/2013 [13-10975] Attorney for Appellee: Solari - US mail; Attorney for Appellee: Tanner - US mail. (ECF: Hugh McCullough) [Entered: 05/13/2013 01:49 PM]
April 4, 2013 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant William Luther Douglas. The appellants brief and record excerpts are due on or before 05/13/2013. [Entered: 04/04/2013 01:09 PM]
April 1, 2013 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Kelly McKee Dorsey, Filer: William L. Douglas, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 03/14/2013, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 02/28/2013. [Entered: 04/01/2013 03:59 PM]
April 1, 2013 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: William L. Douglas, Court Reporter: Kelly McKee Dorsey, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 02/28/2013. [Entered: 04/01/2013 03:58 PM]
March 20, 2013 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by R. Brian Tanner, for USA (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 03/20/2013 01:27 PM]
March 20, 2013 Added Attorney(s) R. Brian Tanner for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 13-10975. [Entered: 03/21/2013 08:23 AM]
March 20, 2013 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William Luther Douglas. [Entered: 03/22/2013 04:18 PM]
March 15, 2013 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Attorney Hugh J. McCullough for Appellant William Luther Douglas in 13-10975. [Entered: 03/20/2013 02:16 PM]
March 11, 2013 CJA 20 voucher issued by this court to Attorney Hugh J. McCollough for Appellant William Luther Douglas. [Entered: 03/11/2013 10:59 AM]
March 6, 2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant William Luther Douglas on 03/06/2013. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 03/11/2013 10:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. William Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: R. Brian Tanner
Represented By: James D. Durham
Represented By: Brian T. Rafferty
Represented By: Jennifer G. Solari
Represented By: Edward J. Tarver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: WILLIAM LUTHER DOUGLAS
Represented By: Hugh J. McCullough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?