Sheryl Hamilton v. Coffee Health Group, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHERYL LEGGS HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee: COFFEE HEALTH GROUP, now known as Regional Care Hospital and MELINDA ENGLAND
Case Number: 13-14152
Filed: September 12, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sheryl Hamilton v. Coffee Health Group, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SHERYL LEGGS HAMILTON
Represented By: Michael Levoy Weathers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: COFFEE HEALTH GROUP, now known as Regional Care Hospital
Represented By: Patrick Fred Clark
Represented By: Natalie N. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MELINDA ENGLAND
Represented By: Patrick Fred Clark
Represented By: Natalie N. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?