Pablo Maldonado v. Unnamed Defendant, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: PABLO F. MALDONADO
Defendant - Appellee: UNNAMED DEFENDANT, JEFFERSON, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department, CARTER, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department, BROWN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department and ELLIS, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 15-10867
Filed: March 2, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 26, 2016 Pablo F. Maldonado v. Unnamed Defendant, et al

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pablo Maldonado v. Unnamed Defendant, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: PABLO F. MALDONADO
Represented By: Pablo F. Maldonado
Represented By: GDCP Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNNAMED DEFENDANT
Represented By: Samuel Scott Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JEFFERSON, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: William Thomas Mitchell
Represented By: Karen Woodward
Represented By: Samuel Scott Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CARTER, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: William Thomas Mitchell
Represented By: Karen Woodward
Represented By: Samuel Scott Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BROWN, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: William Thomas Mitchell
Represented By: Karen Woodward
Represented By: Samuel Scott Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ELLIS, individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Newton County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: William Thomas Mitchell
Represented By: Karen Woodward
Represented By: Samuel Scott Olens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?