USA v. Craig Elkins
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CRAIG LAMAR ELKINS
Case Number: 16-10592
Filed: February 11, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2017 Mandate issued as to Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. [Entered: 01/26/2017 09:58 AM]
January 9, 2017 Returned Mail was received for Party Craig Lamar Elkins. Address has been verified and updated, and mail has been re-sent. IN RE: 12/28/2016 Judgment. [Entered: 01/19/2017 04:55 PM]
December 28, 2016 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Nathan Taylor Williams is GRANTED. [ # 7802952-2 ]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 12/28/2016 02:21 PM]
December 28, 2016 Judgment entered as to Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. [Entered: 12/28/2016 02:22 PM]
December 28, 2016 Removed from case: Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins in 16-10592. [Entered: 12/28/2016 02:25 PM]
July 26, 2016 Appellant's SEALED PSI for the Electronic ROA Program filed by Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. [Entered: 07/26/2016 01:27 PM]
July 5, 2016 RESPONSE has been filed by Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins to Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Nathan Taylor Williams in 16-10592 [ # 7802952-2 ]. [Entered: 07/18/2016 02:08 PM]
June 15, 2016 Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. 1 VOLUMES - 2 SETS [Entered: 06/15/2016 02:19 PM]
June 13, 2016 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. (ECF: Nathan Williams) [Entered: 06/13/2016 10:33 AM]
June 7, 2016 Notice of deficient Motion filed 'ACTION REQUIRED" by Nathan Taylor Williams for Craig Lamar Elkins. Incomplete Motion and Ander Brief - The Motion to withdraw and Anders Brief does not show the address where the documents were sent to the Appellant. Please file a notice stating where the documents were mailed and date sent. [Entered: 06/07/2016 10:06 AM]
June 7, 2016 Public Communication: E-mail to Appellant Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Craig Lamar Elkin to return my call regarding attorney's information. [Entered: 06/07/2016 10:12 AM]
June 7, 2016 Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. [Entered: 06/07/2016 04:45 PM]
June 7, 2016 Notice Regarding Craig Elkins' Mailing Address filed by Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. (ECF: Nathan Williams) [Entered: 06/07/2016 01:13 PM]
June 6, 2016 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. Motion is Unopposed [7802952-1] (ECF: Nathan Williams) [Entered: 06/05/2016 01:55 PM]
June 6, 2016 Appellant's Anders Brief filed by Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. (ECF: Nathan Williams) [Entered: 06/05/2016 01:53 PM]
May 6, 2016 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/06/2016. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 05/06/2016 03:50 PM]
April 26, 2016 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Gilbert, Filer: Craig L. Elkins, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 04/26/2016, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 08/28/2015. [Entered: 04/26/2016 10:19 AM]
April 15, 2016 Transcripts were due to be filed on 04/11/2016 by Court Reporter Debbie Gilbert and are overdue. A 10% discount is required after 05/10/2016. A 20% discount is required after 06/09/2016. [Entered: 04/15/2016 04:26 PM]
March 30, 2016 TRANSCRIPTS FILED on 2/22/16: NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Craig Lamar Elkins held on 01/26/2016 Sentencing, before Judge R. Stan Baker. Court Reporter/Transcriber Debbie Gilbert, [Entered: 03/30/2016 12:22 PM]
March 30, 2016 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Debbie Gilbert, 03/11/2016, Craig L. Elkins, Sentencing 01/26/2016 , Plea Hearing 08/28/2015. [Entered: 03/30/2016 12:25 PM]
March 15, 2016 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to R. Brian Tanner for USA. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/15/2016 12:25 PM]
March 15, 2016 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Craig L. Elkins, Court Reporter: Debbie Gilbert, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 01/26/2016, Plea Hearing 08/28/2015. [Entered: 03/15/2016 11:48 AM]
March 14, 2016 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney R. Brian Tanner for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 03/14/2016 02:02 PM]
March 11, 2016 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. Transcript(s) ordered. (ECF: Nathan Williams) [Entered: 03/11/2016 02:28 PM]
March 11, 2016 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Nathan Taylor Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: Nathan Williams) [Entered: 03/11/2016 02:25 PM]
February 29, 2016 E-filed Appearance of Counsel processed for Attorney R. Brian Tanner for Appellee USA in 16-10592. [Entered: 02/29/2016 05:32 PM]
February 29, 2016 Added Attorney(s) R. Brian Tanner for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 16-10592. [Entered: 02/29/2016 05:32 PM]
February 25, 2016 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by R. Brian Tanner, for USA (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 02/25/2016 02:20 PM]
February 17, 2016 CJA 20 voucher issued by this court to Attorney Nathan T. Williams for Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins. [Entered: 02/17/2016 02:57 PM]
February 11, 2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Craig Lamar Elkins on 02/10/2016. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 02/17/2016 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Craig Elkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: R. Brian Tanner
Represented By: Carlton R. Bourne Jr.
Represented By: James D. Durham
Represented By: Brian T. Rafferty
Represented By: Edward J. Tarver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CRAIG LAMAR ELKINS
Represented By: Craig Lamar Elkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?