Jimmy Teems v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme
Petitioner - Appellant: JIMMY RAY TEEMS
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Interested Party: WELLS FARGO
Case Number: 16-11595
Filed: April 11, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jimmy Teems v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JIMMY RAY TEEMS
Represented By: Jimmy Ray Teems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Samuel Scott Olens
Represented By: Jason Matthew Rea
Represented By: Paula Khristian Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: WELLS FARGO
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?