Michael Bell v. Attorney General, State of FL, et al
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL BELL
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 16-11791
Filed: April 19, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Bell v. Attorney General, State of FL, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: MICHAEL BELL
Represented By: Michael Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Represented By: Tineshia Morris
Represented By: Carolyn M. Snurkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Tineshia Morris
Represented By: Carolyn M. Snurkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?