Keith Tharpe v. Warden
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH THARPE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN
Case Number: 17-14027
Filed: September 6, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Keith Tharpe is DENIED. [8240538-2]; Motion to stay execution filed by Appellant Keith Tharpe is DENIED. [8241090-2] GBT, SM and CRW; Wilson, concurring.--[Edited 09/22/2017 by DLT]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Keith Tharpe v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: KEITH THARPE
Represented By: Brian Kammer
Represented By: Lynn Margo Damiano Pearson
Represented By: Marcia A. Widder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?