Marcus Ivey, et al v. Jeffrey Mann, et al
| BRUCE VAIL, SHERRY BOSTON, COURTNEY JOHNSON and JEFFREY MANN |
| MARVIS MCDANIEL-IVEY and MARCUS D. IVEY |
| 19-10556 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of filing: Amended Complaint on Appeal as to Appellants Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey. [Entered: 04/03/2019 04:51 PM] |
| RETURNED UNFILED: Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Brief filed by Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey is returned unfiled because the briefing schedule has not yet issued. [Entered: 03/21/2019 10:44 AM] |
| RETURNED UNFILED:Appellant's premature brief is returned unfiled because it is not in compliance with the rules. See enclosed blue instructions for proper filing. The brief is not due yet, please do not send a brief until a briefing schedule issues. [Entered: 03/11/2019 12:41 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/03/2019 03:06 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey on 02/05/2019 USDC motion pending: Motion to Appoint Counsel filed on 02/14/2019. DE# 5. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/20/2019 05:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
