Anyi Artica-Romero v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ANYI ARTICA-ROMERO |
| 19-11340 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Anyi Artica-Romero. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8773217-1] [Entered: 05/15/2019 11:03 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Linda Julin McNamara for United States U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida for USA. [19-11340] (ECF: Linda McNamara) [Entered: 04/29/2019 10:37 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Linda Julin McNamara for United States. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11340] (ECF: Linda McNamara) [Entered: 04/29/2019 10:39 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney William Mallory Kent for Appellant Anyi Artica-Romero. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-11340] (ECF: William Kent) [Entered: 04/24/2019 09:07 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William Mallory Kent for Anyi Artica-Romero. [19-11340] (ECF: William Kent) [Entered: 04/24/2019 09:04 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William Mallory Kent for Anyi Artica-Romero. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/24/2019 07:53 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 04/18/2019 as to Appellant Anyi Artica-Romero. [Entered: 04/19/2019 12:41 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Anyi Artica-Romero was filed on 02/05/2019. Docket Entry 30. [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:00 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Anyi Artica-Romero on 04/08/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/10/2019 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Anyi Artica-Romero v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Linda Julin McNamara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ANYI ARTICA-ROMERO | |
| Represented By: | William Mallory Kent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
