The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation v. Mavis Tire Supply LLC
| MAVIS TIRE SUPPLY LLC |
| THE REINALT-THOMAS CORPORATION, d.b.a. Discount Tire |
| 19-13031 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***ENTERED IN ERROR***Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC DE #: 88--[Edited 08/28/2019 by AGW] [Entered: 08/28/2019 09:52 AM] |
ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 8864432-2 ] [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:09 AM]
|
| Public Communication: Disregard letter issued staying the case due to FRAP 4 because appellant filed a voluntary motion to dismiss. [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:05 AM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC's motion for voluntary dismissal, FRAP Rule 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:10 AM] |
| MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Mavis Tire Supply LLC. Motion is Unopposed. [8864432-1] [19-13031] (ECF: Kevin King) [Entered: 08/27/2019 03:54 PM] |
| Appearance of counsel form has not been processed. According to our records, Lawrence Kurt Nodine for The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation is a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar in inactive status. Your appearance form will not be processed until your bar membership has been renewed. [Entered: 08/23/2019 10:24 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard Charles Henn, Jr. for The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation. [19-13031] (ECF: Chittam Thakore) [Entered: 08/22/2019 06:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Chittam Udayan Thakore for The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation. [19-13031] (ECF: Chittam Thakore) [Entered: 08/22/2019 05:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lawrence Kurt Nodine for The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation. [19-13031] (ECF: Lawrence Nodine) [Entered: 08/22/2019 05:23 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kevin F. King for Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-13031] (ECF: Kevin King) [Entered: 08/22/2019 04:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Richard W. Miller for The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation [19-13031] (ECF: Richard Miller) [Entered: 08/22/2019 05:32 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Kevin F. King for Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC. [19-13031] (ECF: Kevin King) [Entered: 08/14/2019 06:01 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 08/07/2019 as to Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC. [Entered: 08/13/2019 02:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kevin King for Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC [19-13031] (ECF: Kevin King) [Entered: 08/13/2019 05:03 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC on 08/07/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/17/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/22/2019 as to Appellant Mavis Tire Supply LLC. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/05/2019 as to Appellee The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation [Entered: 08/13/2019 02:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
